| |||||||||||
Responsibility 2016 : Responsibility 5th Global Conference | |||||||||||
Link: http://www.inter-disciplinary.net/probing-the-boundaries/persons/ethics-everyday-life/call-for-papers/ | |||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Call For Papers | |||||||||||
Responsibility 5th Global Conference Call for Submissions 2016 Thursday 17th March – Saturday 19th March 2016 Budapest, Hungary As evidenced by the outrage at banking institutions and the governments that failed to hold them accountable for the Global Financial Crisis, calls for Muslim leaders to take more responsibility for condemning Islamic extremists and the perennial accusations that young people lack the personal responsibility of previous generations, the concept of responsibility features prominently in a diverse range of social, political and cultural discussions. While issues of responsibility are seldom far from the public eye, the ways in which they are framed often send mixed messages about expected behaviour. On one hand, we are often told that the ability to recognise the consequences of our actions and take responsibility for them is not only a measure of maturity, it is a marker of good character. On the other hand, certain legal protections, cultural cues that encourage individuals to blame others for their circumstances and the public’s willingness to look the other way when famous and powerful people misbehave provide opportunities – and even incentives – for avoiding responsibility. It is precisely because responsibility is invoked in different ways, in different contexts and in the service of different viewpoints that the concept has acquired a richness of meaning that is complex and, at times, contradictory. We may use phrases like ‘taking responsibility’ and ‘holding someone responsible’, but what does responsibility really mean? What are the necessary conditions for responsibility? Where does responsibility begin and end? Is there ever virtue in irresponsibility or in sidestepping questions of responsibility altogether? How do perceptions of responsibility colour the way we behave in our personal relationships, our occupations and as citizens in communities? Can concepts of responsibility be applied meaningfully to non-human entities such as governments, corporations or organisations? How can discussions of responsibility lead to substantive, positive changes aimed at personal development and social justice? The Global Project on Responsibility provides a platform for exploring these questions from an interdisciplinary perspective. As the project’s inaugural event, the Global Conference on Responsibility serves as a broad survey of the meaning and implications of responsibility. Building on the discussions of the first conference, the project will offer conferences, workshops and seminars that enable participants to drill down into the dynamics of responsibility as it plays out on an individual, collective and institutional level. The strand of programming that highlights personal responsibility will focus on how responsibility informs the ways in which individuals live their lives and interact with each other. In recognition that institutions play a critical role in shaping the social, political and cultural landscape we occupy, a separate strand will explore what is at stake when the concept of responsibility is applied to non-human entities with their own structures, rules and objectives. The third and final strand of programming examines collective responsibility as a middle ground between the individual and organised institutions whose agency and obligations are legally recognised. This strand considers the implications of holding members of a group (usually defined on the basis of factors like race, gender, sexuality, ethnicity, nationality or profession) accountable for the actions of other members as well as current and historical actions carried out in the group’s name. The project organisers welcome proposals for presentations, workshops, performances, installations, readings and panels that explore the concept of responsibility in ways that include, but are not limited to: Defining Responsibility Philosophical perspectives on responsibility and free will (and related concepts such as obligation, culpability, accountability and reparations) Legal perspectives on responsibility and defences related to diminished capacity Legislating responsibility Responsibility in religious traditions Concepts of responsibility in different cultures Social forces that discourage or encourage taking responsibility Responsibility and power: having power within a situation or state of affairs to be able to respond Personal Responsibility Role of parents/guardians, educators, public institutions, media and other social forces in shaping how personal responsibility is defined and experienced Responsibility and the formation of civic character/notions of citizenship within communities Limits on personal responsibility Responsibility and personal development, including self-help models Enforcement, punishment and other responses to lapses of responsibility Legal perspectives on responsibility, the defence of diminished responsibility Relationship between sanity and responsibility Guilt and the by-products of accepting responsibility Teaching responsibility inside and outside the classroom Responsibility in the workplace and other professional contexts Activism (ethical consumer practices, volunteerism, etc) Financial responsibility (money and debt management) Exploring personal responsibility through film, literature and the arts Blame culture Institutional Responsibility Obligations of corporations (e.g. tax avoidance, banker bonuses and corporate bailout amid economic austerity, corporations as people) Levels and limits of Governmental responsibility for shaping behaviour and preventing harms to the community Responsibility and foreign policy involving governmental and non-governmental actors Obligations of NGOs Negotiating personal morality and professional duty (e.g. workers in abortion clinics, refusal of service on the basis of religious beliefs, etc.) Institutional cover-ups and whistle-blowing around illegal/unethical practices (e.g. Jimmy Saville phenomenon, NHS whistle-blowers, Edward Snowden, Julian Assange) Enforcement, punishment and penalties for institutional irresponsibility Public management policy perspectives on accountability and responsibility Community responses to institutions that assume/neglect responsibility Collective Responsibility Challenges of assigning and enforcing collective responsibility Collective memory, shame and guilt Inter-generational responsibility and guilt: does responsibility for events like the Holocaust end with the generation that perpetrated them? Reparations Acknowledgment of responsibility in the historical record and educational curriculum Backlash against collective responsibility Exploring collective responsibility through film, literature and the arts Strategies for dealing with collective responsibility in governmental and non-governmental contexts Professional responsibility (e.g. responsible scientific/medical research, the responsibility of the entertainment industry to promote racial and ethnic diversity, responsibility of labour unions to promote workers’ interests, etc.). For further details and information please see the project website: http://www.inter-disciplinary.net/probing-the-boundaries/persons/ethics-everyday-life/call-for-papers/ Call for Cross-Over Presentations The Responsibility project will be meeting at the same time as a project on Experiencing Prison and another project on Recognising Evil. We welcome submissions which cross the divide between both project areas. If you would like to be considered for a cross project session, please mark your submission “Crossover Submission”. What to Send 300 word abstracts, proposals and other forms of contribution should be submitted by Friday 9th October 2015. All submissions be minimally double reviewed, under anonymous (blind) conditions, by a global panel drawn from members of the Project Team and the Advisory Board. In practice our procedures usually entail that by the time a proposal is accepted, it will have been triple and quadruple reviewed. You will be notified of the panel’s decision by Monday 19th October 2015. If your submission is accepted for the conference, a full draft of your contribution should be submitted by Friday 5th February 2016. Abstracts may be in Word, RTF or Notepad formats with the following information and in this order: a) author(s), b) affiliation as you would like it to appear in programme, c) email address, d) title of proposal, e) body of proposal, f) up to 10 keywords. E-mails should be entitled: Responsibility Abstract Submission Where to Send Abstracts should be submitted simultaneously to both Organising Chairs: Organising Chairs: Sean Moran: sean@inter-disciplinary.net Rob Fisher: responsibility5@inter-disciplinary.net This event is an inclusive interdisciplinary research and publishing project. It aims to bring together people from different areas and interests to share ideas and explore various discussions which are innovative and exciting. All papers accepted for and presented at the conference must be in English and will be eligible for publication in an ISBN eBook. Selected papers may be developed for publication in a themed hard copy volume(s). All publications from the conference will require editors, to be chosen from interested delegates from the conference. Ethos Inter-Disciplinary.Net believes it is a mark of personal courtesy and professional respect to your colleagues that all delegates should attend for the full duration of the meeting. If you are unable to make this commitment, please do not submit an abstract for presentation. Please note: Inter-Disciplinary.Net is a not-for-profit network and we are not in a position to be able to assist with conference travel or subsistence. |
|