| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
All CFPs on WikiCFP | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Present CFP : 2012 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
** Apologies if you receive multiple copies of this announcement **
** Please forward to anyone who might be interested ** SECOND CALL FOR PAPERS for the 7th International and ECAI 2012 Workshop on EXPLANATION-AWARE COMPUTING (ExaCt 2012) One-Day Workshop, 27 or 28 August 2012, Montpellier, France http://exact2012.workshop.hm ** Submission deadline: May 28, 2012 ** When knowledge-based systems are partners in interactive socio- technical processes, with incomplete and changing problem descriptions, effective communication between human and software system is vital. Explanations exchanged between human agents and software agents may play a key role in such mixed-initiative problem solving. For example, explanations may increase the confidence of the user in specific results or in the system as a whole, by providing evidence of how the results were derived. AI research has also focused on how computer systems can themselves use explanations, for example to guide learning. Explanation-awareness in computing system development aims at making systems able to interact more effectively or naturally with their users, or better able to understand and exploit knowledge about their own processing. Systems intended to exhibit explanation-awareness must be more than simple reactive systems. When the word 'awareness' is used in conjunction with the word 'explanation' it implies some consciousness about explanation and reasoning about explanations at the knowledge level. Thinking of the Web not only as a collection of web pages, but as providing a Web of experiences exchanged by people on many platforms, gives rise to new challenges and opportunities to leverage experiential knowledge in explanation. For example, records of experiences on the Web and interrelationships between experiences may provide provenance and meta-data for explanations and can provide examples to help instil confidence in computing systems. The interplay of provenance information with areas such as trust and reputation, reasoning and meta-reasoning, and explanation are known, but not yet well exploited. Outside of artificial intelligence, disciplines such as cognitive science, linguistics, philosophy of science, psychology, and education have investigated explanation as well. They consider varying aspects, making it clear that there are many different views of the nature of explanation and facets of explanation to explore. Two relevant examples of these are open learner models in education, and dialogue management and planning in natural language generation. The ExaCt workshop series aims to draw on the multiple perspectives on explanation, to examine how explanation can be applied to further the development of robust and dependable systems, and increase transparency, user sense of control, trust, acceptance, and decision support. GOALS AND AUDIENCE The main goal of the workshop is to bring together researchers, scientists from both industry and academia, and representatives from different communities and areas such as those mentioned above, to study, understand, and explore explanation in AI applications. In addition to presentations and discussions of invited contributions and invited talks, this workshop will offer organised and open spaces for targeted discussions and creating an interdisciplinary community. Demonstration sessions will provide the opportunity to showcase explanation-enabled/ -aware applications. TOPICS OF INTEREST Suggested topics for contributions (not restricted to IT views): * Models and knowledge representations for explanations * Integrating application and explanation knowledge * Explanation-awareness in (designing) applications * Methodologies for developing explanation-aware systems * Explanations and learning * Context-aware explanation vs. explanation-aware context * Confidence and explanations * Privacy, trust, and explanation * Provenance and metareasoning * Empirical studies of explanations * Requirements and needs for explanations to support human understanding * Explanation of complex, autonomous systems * Co-operative explanation * Visualising explanations * Dialogue management and natural language generation Submissions on additional topics are very welcome. SUBMISSIONS AND STYLE Workshop submissions will be electronic, in pdf format only, using the EasyChair submission system linked from the workshop website. Papers must be written in English and not exceed 5 pages in the ECAI format. At least one author of each accepted paper must register for the workshop and the ECAI conference and present the contribution in order to be published in the workshop proceedings. The organising committee is considering editing a special issue of an appropriate international journal depending on the number and quality of the submissions. Those wishing to participate without a paper submission should submit a brief synopsis of their relevant work or a brief statement of interest. The workshop proceedings will be published online on the ECAI website and as CEUR workshop proceedings (http://ceur-ws.org). If you have questions please contact the chairs using the following email address: chairs@exact2012.workhop.hm. IMPORTANT DATES Submission deadline: May 28, 2012 Notification of acceptance: June 28, 2012 Camera-ready versions of papers: July 13, 2012 ExaCt Workshop: August 27/28, 2012 WORKSHOP SCHEDULE The schedule will be made available on the workshop website. See the workshop website for an agenda overview and links to past workshops. CHAIRS Thomas Roth-Berghofer, School of Computing and Technology, University of West London, United Kingdom thomas.roth-berghofer (at) uwl ac uk David B. Leake, School of Informatics and Computing, Indiana University, USA leake (at) cs indiana edu Jörg Cassens, Institute for Multimedia and Interactive Systems (IMIS), University of Lübeck, Germany cassens (at) imis uni-luebeck de PROGRAMME COMMITTEE Agnar Aamodt, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) David W. Aha, Navy Center for Applied Research in AI, Washington DC, USA Martin Atzmüller, University of Kassel, Germany Ivan Bratko, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia Patrick Brézillon, LIP6, France Ashok Goel, Georgia Tech University, Atlanta, GA, USA Pierre Grenon, KMI, The Open University, UK Anders Kofod-Petersen, SINTEF, Norway Hector Muñoz-Avila, Lehigh University, USA Miltos Petridis, University of Brighton, UK Enric Plaza, IIIA-CSIC, Spain Christophe Roche, University of Savoie, France Olga Santos, Spanish National University for Distance Education Gheorghe Tecuci, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA Douglas Walton, University of Windsor, Canada THE YAHOO EXPLANATION GROUP If you would like to participate in discussions on the topic of explanation or like to receive further information about this workshop you might consider joining the Yahoo!-group http://groups.yahoo.com/group/explanation-research. Information on explanation research is also collected here: http://on-explanation.net. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|